utturmed consent terms between petitioner and respondents were take on record. High Court disposed of two writ petitions and two civil applications based on said consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
36 wp.300.06 n 301.06
ndm
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 300 OF 2006
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 301 OF 2006
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr. A.S.Desai for the Petitioner.
Mr. A.C.Shah for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 20th October, 2011.
P.C.
. The learned counsel appearing for the parties
have tendered consent terms duly singed by the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.1 and 2 as well as their respective Advocates. The Petitioner and Respondent No.1 are personally present in the Court and they accept the correctness of the contents of the consent terms. The common consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
2 The original consent terms are taken on record of the Writ Petition No.300 of 2006 and a copy thereof shall be kept on the record of the Writ Petition No.301
2
36 wp.300.06 n 301.06
of 2006.
3 The undertakings in the consent terms are accepted. The petition are disposed of in terms of the consent terms.
4 Civil Application No.1449 of 2010 and Civil Application No.696 of 2011 do not survive and the same are disposed of.
[ A.S.OKA, J ]
Petitioner
Respondent No. 2
A.S. OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
