The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the petitioner's leave to withdraw the Criminal Writ Petition and subsequently dismissed it as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw was granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
District : Beed
Criminal Writ Petition No. 270 of 2011
(Ramdas s/o. Dashrath Ransing
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & another)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders ............................................................................. Mr. B.N. Palve, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.P. More, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent no.1. .............................................................................
CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. DATE : 8TH AUGUST 2011
bgp/kwp270
Ramdas s/o. Dashrath Ransing
The State of Maharashtra
SHRIHARI P. DAVARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
