The petitioner sought to withdraw his writ petition challenging a Special Executive Magistrate's order, obtaining liberty to pursue an alternative remedy via revision before the Sessions Court.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to pursue revision before the Sessions Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp25711
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 257 OF 2011
Yunus Gause Pasha Khan ...Petitioner V/s.
Catherine Lawrence Mathew and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Parvez Ubharay i/by Mr. Sanjay Gade for the Petitioner Ms. Aparna D. Vhatkar for Respondents No. 8 and 9 Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the State.
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR AND
A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATE: 7TH FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C.:-
The counsel for the petitioner, in all fairness, submits that
the challenge in this petition is essentially to the order passed by the Special Executive Magistrate in Chapter Case proceedings and under Section 145 of the Code. If it is so, the said order is amenable to revision before the Sessions Court.
A.R. JOSHI, J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Yunus Gause Pasha Khan
Catherine Lawrence Mathew and Ors.
A.M. Khanwilkar
A.R. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
