Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn by petitioner following a clarifying affidavit from the respondent Society regarding the nature of a loan, with no objection from respondents.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp256.11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 256 OF 2011
_____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders |
Mr. D.G. Choudhari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.P. Suryawanshi holding for N.R. Pawade, Advocate for respondent no.3. Mrs. V.A. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondent no. 1.
(B.P. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE.
27.01.2011 gas/wp256.11
Petitioner
Respondent no. 1 (AGP)
Respondent no. 3 (Society)
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
