Praveena Lakshmanan v. Kaustubh Sudhir Mestry
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed to challenge the Family Court's permission to the respondent to file a written statement without attending a counseling session. The High Court held no patent mistake existed requiring rectification under Article 227. The court directed the Family Court to convene the parties for counseling after hearing advocates.
What did the court decide?
Written petition disposed of; Family Court directed to fix date for counseling after hearing advocates.