This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1792 OF 2011
[Dwarkadas Ramchandra Mandhane VERSUS Ramlal Mansingh Gawli (Choudhary) Through L.R.s and ors.]
Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, Advocate for the petitioner
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
P.C.:-
petitioner. Perused the impugned order. I find that petitioner has not suffered any prejudice because of the same. All contentions are still open and he can advance appropriate arguments at the stage of final
hearing in Regular Civil Appeal.
Sd/-
DT. : 10.03.2011 [B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] arp
Dwarkadas Ramchandra Mandhane
Ramlal Mansingh Gawli (Choudhary) Through L.R.s and ors.
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
