Petitioner, an under-trial prisoner, sought facility of home food. The Court held the issue is covered by a previous High Court decision and directed the petitioner to apply to the Trial Court afresh for the facility.
Petitioner given liberty to approach Trial Court afresh; Writ Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1406.10
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1406 OF 2010
Mohd.Zubair Saiyed Anwar
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Mr.P.V.Dhopalkar, Advocate appointed for Petitioner.
Ms.S.V.Gajare, A.P.P. for Respondent.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND A.R.JOSHI, JJ. DATED:- JANUARY 7, 2011.
P.C.
Mukadam & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. reported in 2004
All.M.R. (Cri.) 3010, which answers the point in issue. We are in agreement with the submission of the learned A.P.P. that it will be open to the petitioner to apply before the Trial Court afresh for providing facility of
home food, clothes and toiletry items to him while he is under trial prisoner
1406.10
2
and the same can be decided on the basis of the legal position expounded in the above said decision.
jail.
(A.R.JOSHI, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Asgar Yusuf Mukadam & Ors.Referred¶13
Asgar Yusuf Mukadam & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. reported in 2004 All.M.R. (Cri.) 3010
Mohd.Zubair Saiyed Anwar
The State of Maharashtra
A.M.Khanwilkar
A.R.Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
