This Single Judge Writ Petition challenged the rejection of an application for amendment of written-statement filed after the commencement of trial. The Court held that no error occurred in the trial Court's approach, and the petitioner should approach the trial court for review under Order 43 Rule 1A CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1267.11.sxw
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No. 1267 of 2011
Ramchandra Babu Gadiwan ..Petitioner v/s. Mr. Shamrao Babu Gadiwan & anr. ..Respondents
Mr. Vijay Killedar for the petitioner.
CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J.
DATED :- MARCH 11, 2011.
P.C.
By way of present petition the petitioner challenges the order dated
10th January, 2011 thereby rejecting the application filed by the present petitioner for amendment of written-statement.
2
wp1267.11.sxw
for review under provisions of Order 43 Rule 1A of the CPC.
(B.R. GAVAI, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order rejecting the amendment of written-station after commencement of trial is maintainable as a writ petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramchandra Babu Gadiwan
Mr. Shamrao Babu Gadiwan & anr.
B.R. GAVALI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
