This petition challenged the rejection of a request for permission to transport excavated sand. The court held the impugned order was correct as no provision allowed the respondents to license a purchaser for transportation and dismissed the petition.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 11309 OF 2010
Mukesh s/o. Subhash Khule, Age : 35 years, Occupation : Business, R/o. Station Road, Dhule, Taluka & District : Dhule. .. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra (Through its Secretary, Revenue and Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32), and 3 others. .. Respondents.
Mr. D.B. Thoke, Advocate, holding for Mr. N.L. Choudhari, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mrs. V.A. Shinde, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos. 1 to 4.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATE : 19TH JANUARY 2011
(2)
COURT'S ORDER :
(3)
of Collector by filing affidavit of Tahsildar before this Court.
( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI ) JUDGE
bgp/wp11309
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents have jurisdiction to grant transport permission for sand purchased by the petitioner.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to file the present writ petition for such permission.
Mukesh s/o. Subhash Khule
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
