This is a single-paragraph order where the High Court directed the trial court to dispose of a 1992 suit consolidated with a newer suit within six months to serve the interests of justice, denying further extensions.
Directed the trial court to dispose of both consolidated suits within six months, with no further extension for the 1992 suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1127.10.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No. 1127 of 2010
Mr. Mohan Bhikaji Dongre ..Petitioner v/s. M/s. Nalanda Enterprises & anr. ..Respondents
Mr. K.K. Malpathak for the petitioner.
CORAM:- B.R. GAVAI, J.
DATED :- MARCH 03, 2011.
P.C.
Heard Shri Malpathak for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents though duly served with notice for final disposal and appearance has been filed on behalf of the respondents.
which the Special Civil Suit No. 595/92 filed by the petitioner has been consolidated with special civil suit no. 163/2003 filed by the respondent no. 1.
wp1127.10.sxw
2
(B.R. GAVAI, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Special Civil Suit No. 595/92 (filed in 1992) consolidated with a later suit requires expedited disposal to prevent undue delay.
Mohan Bhikaji Dongre
M/s. Nalanda Enterprises
B.R. Gavai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
