Pramod Fulchand Jategaonkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged supply of furniture tenders on grounds of procedural violation of Government Resolution and inadequate advertisement circulation. Court directed Chief Secretary to dispose of a representation within four weeks, restraining final contract award during that period.
What did the court decide?
Direction to Chief Secretary to dispose representation within four weeks and restraint from awarding contract for four weeks.
What the court decided
wp-1089-11.sxw
1
dgm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1089 OF 2011
Pramod Fulchand Jategaonkar .... Petitioner vs
1 The State of Maharashtra & anr.
.... Respondents
Mr. Kishor S. Patil for the petitioner. Mr. C.R. Sonavane, AGP for respondents/State.
CORAM: DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATE : February 02, 2011
P.C.:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be directed to quash a tender process that allegedly violated Government Resolution procedures?
Whether the petitioner should be granted a direction to dispose of a representation regarding an alleged procedural irregularity in tendering?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pramod Fulchand Jategaonkar
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court