In the absence of the petitioner even on a second call, the single judge dismissed two writ petitions for want of prosecution in continuation of earlier orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1026 OF 2011
( Shri. Namdev Ramchandra Kadu-Patil Vs. Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd.) WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1027 OF 2011
| Office No |
tes, | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memoranda appearances, or directions orders |
of Cour and |
Coram, t’s orders Registrar’s |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
| CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED : 7th March, 2011. PER COURT : |
|||
| 1. These orders are to be read in continuation of earlier | |||
| orders dated 21st February 2011. | |||
| 2. Shri. Namdev Ramchandra Kadu-Patil in his personal capacity is not present even on second call. 3. In earlier orders this Court had already noted his request for returning both petitions to him. The subject matter and the mode and the manner in which the proceedings are conducted as also opportunity given to him to engage lawyer are already noted. 4. As petitioner is absent today even on second call, both petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. |
|||
| [ B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ] | |||
| ssc/wp1026.11 |
Shri. Namdev Ramchandra Kadu-Patil
Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
B.P. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
