The High Court rejected the writ petition maintaining that the statutory appeal under the Maharashtra Municipalities Election Rules, 1966 was exhausted.
The petition is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Bsb
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10251 OF 2011
Mrs.Sulbha Vijay Lokande ... Petitioner v/s Chief Officer, State Municipal Council of Panchgani & ors. ... Respondents
Mr.Vaijayanti R. Kalekar for the petitioner. Mr.Siddharth Karpe for respondent No.1. Mr.S.B.Shetye for respondent No.2. Mr.S.K.Shinde, Addl. G.P. with Mr.A.B.Vagyani, A.G.P. for respondent No.3.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, JJ.
DATED: 30TH NOVEMBER, 2011
P.C.:
(SMT.NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)
2
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition maintained when an appeal under the Maharashtra Municipalities Election Rules, 1966 is available.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sulbha Vijay Lokande
Chief Officer, State Municipal Council of Panchgani
B.H.MARLAPALLE
NISHITA MHATRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court