In this writ petition, the High Court of Bombay dismissed the petition on preliminary grounds, noting that an appeal against the order impugned was previously dismissed by a division Bench without any liberty to approach the High Court, rendering the current petition untenable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp10198.10.sxw
gst
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
WRIT PETITION NO. 10198 OF 2010
| Kaka Rana Patil .... | ..... | .... | Petitioner. |
|---|---|---|---|
| V/s | |||
| Chandrakant Gopinath Patil ... | ..... | .... | Respondent. |
Mr.Jayant Gaikwad, Adv. For the petitioner. Mr.S.P.Thorat, Adv. For the respondent.
CORAM: B.R. GAVAI, J. 7th March, 2011
PC:
Learned counsel for the respondents takes preliminary objection that the order impugned has been challenged before this Court by way of Appeal from Order No.1057/10 which was dismissed on 1.12.2010.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable when an appeal against the impugned order has already been dismissed without liberty to file a writ petition.
Kaka Rana Patil
Chandrakant Gopinath Patil
B.R. GAVAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
