Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Aarti Muley Vs Arun Ramchandra Muley — Bombay HC (2011) — LawSathi Research

Home
Bombay HC
2011
Aarti Muley Vs Arun Ramchandra MuleyAarti Muley v. Arun Ramchandra Muley

Disposed

Aarti Muley v. Arun Ramchandra Muley

Bombay HC8 Mar 2011TP/242/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bulk order in numerous testamentary petitions directing parties to remove office objections by 10th June 2011 or face dismissal.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioners to remove office objections in the petitions on or before 10th June, 2011, otherwise the petitions to stand dismissed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

TS-559-07-c-sr.12-461.sxw

1

USJ

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NOS. :- 559/2007, 564/2007, 572/2007, 579/2007, 605/2007, 616/2007, 617/2007, 618/ 2007, 624/2007, 628/2007, 633/2007, 636/2007, 637/2007, 641/2007, 642/2007, 663/2007, 670/2007, 687/2007, 732/2007, 743/2007, 747/2007, 764/2007, 771/2007, 776/2007, 783/2007, 788/2007, 791/2007, 798/2007, 800/2007, 811/2007, 813/2007, 821/2007, 822/2007, 823/2007, 847/2007, 849/2007, 879/2007, 885/2007, 894/2007, 896/2007, 897/2007, 902/2007, 921/2007, 922/2007, 923/2007, 926/2007, 931/2007, 932/2007, 940/2007, 942/2007, 943/2007, 946/2007, 950/2007, 955/2007, 963/2007, 966/2007, 987/2007, 990/2007, 996/2007, 1022/2007, 1027/2007, 1034/2007, 1038/2007, 1043/2007, 1052/2007, 1056/2007, 1062/2007, 1105/2007, 1108/2007, 1116/2007, 1119/2007, 1123/2007, 1161/2007, 1166/2007, 1169/2007, 7/2008, 9/2008, 15/2008, 23/2008, 31/2008, 39/2008, 49/2008, 52/2008, 55/2008, 56/2008, 63/2008, 64/2008, 66/2008, 82/2008, 85/2008, 90/2008, 101/2008, 102/2008, 113/2008, 116/2008, 120/2008, 150/2008, 152/2008, 159/2008, 171/2008, 172/2008, 176/2008, 180/2008, 192/2008, 216/2008, 234/2008, 242/2008, 253/2008, 259/2008, 276/2008, 283/2008, 293/2008, 310/2008, 313/2008, 330/2008, 332/2008, 343/2008, 349/2008, 364/2008, 366/2008, 367/2008, 375/2008, 376/2008, 384/2008, 388/2008, 393/2008, 407/2008, 439/2008, 442/2008, 455/2008, 466/2008, 467/2008, 471/2008, 498/2008, 502/2008, 527/2008, 536/2008, 552/2008, 554/2008, 565/2008, 567/2008, 572/2008, 592/2008, 612/2008, 615/2008, 616/2008, 632/2008, 633/2008, 641/2008, 643/2008, 644/2008, 647/2008, 660/2008, 661/2008, 667/2008, 706/2008, 708/2008, 709/2008, 715/2008, 735/2008, 741/2008, 747/2008, 748/2008, 752/2008, 754/2008, 782/2008,

2 TS-559-07-c-sr.12-461.sxw

Coram

AI extract

R.Y.GANOO

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 8 Mar 2011 · March
Registered: 12 Mar 2008
Case no.: TP/242/2008

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R.y. Ganoo

Jyoti Santosh Nair Vs Santosh Nair and Anr.
7 Mar 2011
Alex Mathew Vs Lina Alex and Ors.
7 Mar 2011
Abdul Gafar Abdul Hamid Tamboli Vs Afreen Bano Abdul Gafar Tamboli and Ors.
7 Mar 2011
Sanjay Ramsurat Dubey Vs Rajiv Ramsurat Dubey
8 Mar 2011

Cite this judgement

Aarti Muley v. Arun Ramchandra Muley, TP/242/2008 (BOM), decided on 8 March 2011.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

R.Y.GANOO

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Directed petitioners to remove office objections in the petitions on or before 10th June, 2011, otherwise the petitions to stand dismissed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

In multiple testamentary petitions, the High Court observed that office objections were pending and directed the petitioners to remove them by 10th June 2011. Failure to comply would result in dismissal without further orders.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

783/2008, 815/2008, 832/2008, 847/2008, 855/2008, 858/2008, 863/2008, 866/2008, 870/2008, 871/2008, 887/2008, 891/2008, 900/2008, 902/2008, 923/2008, 930/2008, 936/2008, 937/2008, 938/2008, 954/2008, 964/2008, 997/2008, 981/2008, 982/2008, 983/2008, 993/2008, 997/2008, 1018/2008, 1027/2008, 1030/2008, 1034/2008, 1036/2008, 1039/2008, 1048/2008, 1059/2008, 1064/2008, 1070/2008, 1075/2008, 1080/2008, 1082/2008, 1084/2008, 1092/2008, 1096/2008, 1109/2008, 1115/2008, 1116/2008, 1119/2008, 1128/2008, 1131/2008, 1137/2008, 1146/2008, 14/2009, 21/2009, 35/2009, 47/2009, 71/2009, 82/2009, 101/2009, 108/2009, 116/2009, 117/2009, 119/2009, 140/2009, 144/2009, 165/2009, 169/2009, 193/2009, 194/2009, 198/2009, 203/2009, 211/2009, 218/2009, 222/2009, 223/2009, 225/2009, 238/2009, 247/2009, 250/2009, 252/2009, 253/2009, 257/2009, 260/2009, 269/2009, 271/2009, 272/2009, 275/2009, 279/2009, 284/2009, 290/2009, 298/2009, 299/2009, 300/2009, 305/2009, 309/2009, 325/2009, 341/2009, 342/2009, 343/2009, 349/2009, 354/2009, 372/2009, 375/2009, 388/2009, 389/2009, 390/2009, 394/2009, 396/2009, 397/2009, 404/2009, 406/2009, 413/2009, 415/2009, 418/2009, 423/2009, 432/2009, 437/2009, 444/2009, 446/2009, 452/2009, 455/2009, 467/2009, 474/2009, 475/2009, 481/2009, 486/2009, 488/2009, 498/2009, 502/2009, 511/2009, 520/2009, 525/2009, 527/2009, 531/2009, 541/2009, 542/2009, 549/2009, 566/2009, 570/2009, 578/2009, 593/2009, 602/2009, 603/2009, 604/2009, 605/2009, 614/2009, 621/2009, 622/2009, 623/2009, 629/209, 630/2009, 632/2009, 638/2009, 642/2009, 643/2009, 645/2009, 646/2009, 653/2009, 657/2009, 659/2009, 661/2009, 662/2009, 666/2009, 671/2009, 673/2009, 694/2009, 695/2009, 698/2009, 699/2009, 700/2009, 707/2009, 709/2009, 721/2009, 725/2009, 731/2009, 734/2009, 740/2009, 742/2009, 751/2009, 755/2009, 760/2009, 763/2009, 772/2009, 776/2009, 777/2009, 778/2009, 786/2009, 789/2009,

3 TS-559-07-c-sr.12-461.sxw

791/2009, 792/2009, 796/2009, 801/2009, 813/2009, 814/2009, 825/2009, 828/2009, 835/2009, 836/2009, 837/2009, 839/2009, 843/2009, 845/2009, 846/2009, 851/2009, 852/2009, 858/2009, 862/2009, 875/2009, 883/2009, 895/2009, 902/2009, 903/2009, 904/2009, 911/2009, 912/2009, 913/2009, 919/2009, 922/2009, 924/2009, 932/2009, 936/2009, 948/2009, 953/2009, 957/2009, 969/2009, 970/2009, 973/2009, 974/2009, 975/2009, 995/2009, 999/2009, 1006/2009, 1007/2009, 1013/2009, 1020/2009, 1022/2009, 1024/2009, 1030/2009, 1044/2009, 1048/2009, 1063/2009, 1064/2009, 1068/2009, 1092/2009, 1099/2009, 1113/2009, 1115/2009, 1116/2009, 1119/2009, 1125/2009, 11/2010, 13/2010, 17/2010, 19/2010, 20/2010, 22/2010, 29/2010, 30/2010, 39/2010, 40/2010, 46/2010, 48/2010, 53/2010, 59/2010, 63/2010, 69/2010, 75/2010, 76/2010, 79/2010, 81/2010, 86/2010, 89/2010, 91/2010, 95/2010, 102/2010, 103/2010, 104/2010, 105/2010, 114/2010, 117/2010, 119/2010, 122/2010, 124/2010 and 128/2010.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

Court’s or Judge’s Orders.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 8^th March, 2011. P.C. :

It is noticed that in these petitions office objections have not been removed. The petitioner is directed to remove office objections in the petition on or before 10^th June, 2011. If office objections are not removed by that date, petition to stand dismissed without further orders from the Court.

[R.Y.GANOO, J.]

CNR

HCBM020236362007

Bench

Disposal

REJECTED U/S 986

Kavita Tilok Wadhwani Vs Tilok Tejumal Wadhwani

8 Mar 2011

Lata Shashikant Sharma Vs Shashikant G.Sharma

8 Mar 2011