Devendra P.Patil v. Ramesh v.Pradhan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay dismissed a summary suit for non-prosecution as the writ of summons had not been served on the defendant.
What did the court decide?
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
ss4466-96
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
rpa
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 4466 of 1996
Devendra P. Patil .. Plaintiff V/s.
Ramesh V. Pradhan .. Defendant
None present.
CORAM : A. S. OKA, J.
DATE : JANUARY 13, 2011.
P.C.
None for the plaintiff. Suit is shown under the caption “For
Dismissal”. The office noting shows that even writ of summons has not been served. Hence, the suit is dismissed for non prosecution.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
whether the suit for summary relief should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to unserved writ of summons
Coram
A. S. OKA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court