The High Court, treating the revision application filed under Section 397 CrPC by the Union of India, refused to interfere with the Special Judge's order discharging respondents who had repaid bank dues and settled the dispute, dismissing the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mst
REVN.403.20111
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.403 OF 2011
Union of India Applicant versus Ashok C. Mehta and others Respondents
Mr.S.K.Shinde for applicant.
Mr.Ramdas Hake i/by S.P.Kadam for respondent no.1. Mr.Rajesh More, APP for State.
CORAM : R.V.MORE, J.
DATE : 29th November 2011
PC :
REVN.403.20112
the applicant submits that an appeal against the order of acquittal of the main accused is filed, however, same is neither admitted nor any order is passed therein.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Special Judge's order discharging respondents who had settled bank dues.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Union of India
Ashok C. Mehta
R.V.MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
