Single-judge order permitting the applicant, the original complainant, to withdraw the criminal revision application against an acquittal order, subject to a proviso regarding limitation and potential further appeals.
Leave to withdraw the Criminal Revision Application granted; application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Criminal Revision Application No. of 2011 (Stamp No. 291/2009)
Hari s/o. Narayan Mudkhede, Age : 60 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Marwali, Taluka : Naigaon (Kh.), District : Nanded.
.. Applicant.
versus
(2)
Mr. J.M. Murkute, Advocate, holding for Mr. S.N. Lavekar, Advocate, for the applicant.
Smt. Y.M. Kshirsagar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent no.1.
Mr. U.B. Bilolikar, Advocate, for respondent nos.2 to 5.
CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J.
DATE : 1ST AUGUST 2011
COURT'S ORDER :
(3)
Sections 324, 504 and 506, read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code.
( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE ) JUDGE
bgp/krast291
Hari s/o. Narayan Mudkhede
The State of Maharashtra
Ramkishan s/o. Digamber Mudkhede
Maroti s/o. Digamber Mudkhede
Datta s/o. Digamber Mudkhede
Vimalbai w/o. Digamber Mudkhede
SHRIHARI P. DAVARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
