The court confirmed an ad-interim order appointing a court receiver to take possession of a flat by the plaintiff, during the pendency of the suit, and disposed of the notice of motion.
Confirmation of ad-interim order appointing a court receiver to possess the flat.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
dmt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3028 OF 2006
IN
SUIT NO. 937 OF 2006
Indian Bank ... Plaintiff. V/s. Sarojini Hudson Marks & Anr. ... Defendants. Mr. Nitin Nikam for Plaintiff. None for Defendants.
CORAM : A.A.SAYED, J. DATE : 11th FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C.
the portion bracketed in red, was granted in favour of the plaintiff appointing a Court Receiver in respect of flat in question. The learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the Court Receiver has already taken possession of the said flat.
during the pendency of the suit.
(A.A.SAYED, J.)
A.A.SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
