Allowed
Akruti City Limited. v. Aakruti Estates Private Limited, Gujarat.
Bombay HCNMS/2525/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
s.1867.08 skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23.nms.2525.08 s.1867.08
skt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2525 OF 2008
IN
SUIT NO. 1867 OF 2008
Akruti City Limited ..Plaintiffs -VersusAakruti Estates Private Limited, Gujarat ..Defendants
Mr.Rahul Chitnis i/b Mr. Anil R. Mishra for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 4TH AUGUST 2011.
P.C.
defendants were absent when the ad-interim order dated 14th August 2008 was passed. The plaintiffs are the registered proprietor of the label mark ‘AKRUTI’ wherein the word forms an essential and dominant feature. The defendants have used the identical work mark ‘AAKRUTI’ in its corporate name.
23.nms.2525.08 s.1867.08
3 In the circumstances, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms
of prayer (a).
The Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of.
Akruti City Limited
Aakruti Estates Private Limited
Gujarat
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court