Plaintiff sought declaration that a notice was bad in law and injunction against eviction of a stall. Court dismissed the notice of motion but permitted continued occupation till April 28, 2012.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nms127-11
1
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.127 OF 2011
IN
SUIT NO.118 OF 2011
Sanjay B. Awhad V/s.
Maharashtra Film, stage and Cultural Development Corporation Limited
....Plaintiff
....Defendant
Mr.Sanjiv Sawant i/b Mr.B.K. Barve & Co. for the Plaintiff.
Mr.A.A. Kumbhakoni, Senior Counsel with Mr.Shardul Singh i/b Mr.N.R. Bubna for the Defendant.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 15TH JUNE, 2011.
P.C. :-
2
nms127-11
has decided not to extend the period of the license and has taken a policy decision to let the same out on license by inviting tenders.
The plaint is not filed on this basis. It is always open to the plaintiff to adopt appropriate proceedings if he is able to establish any such discrimination including by filing a Writ Petition. Similarly in the event of the
3 nms127-11
Government of Maharashtra having taken a decision or taking a decision as contended by the plaintiff, he is entitled to file appropriate proceedings in this Court. On the record, there is nothing suggested to that effect.
S.J. Vazifdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
