Single Judge dismissed appeal against rejection of writ petition under Article 227, holding such appeal non-maintainable.
Appeal rejected and dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Kambli
1 LPA 298.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.298 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2987 OF 2011 ... Mr.Rammurthy Ramkhelawan Pal ...Appellant v/s. Mrs.Nirmala Rammurthy Pal and ors. ...Respondents ... Ms.Seema Singh for the Appellant. None for the Respondents.
CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & Anoop V. Mohta, JJ DATED: 14th November, 2011
P.C.:
The Appellant by this Appeal challenges the order passed by the learned single Judge rejecting Writ Petition No.2987 of 2011. That petition was filed by the Petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent in petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, which is rejected, at the
2 LPA 298.11
instance of the Appellant is not maintainable. Appeal is,
therefore, rejected.
(ANOOP V.MOHTA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal against an order rejecting a writ petition filed under Article 227 is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Rammurthy Ramkhelawan Pal
Mrs. Nirmala Rammurthy Pal and ors.
D.K.Deshmukh
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
