Disposed
Parmita Devendra Sakpal v. Devendra Babu Sakpal
Bombay HCJOT/29/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
pps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jo 29-11.sxw
1
pps
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPLICATION JURISDICTION
Judges Order No.29 of 2011 in
Testamentary Petition No. 195 of 2011
Parmita Devendra Sakpal .. Petitioner
Mr.S.U.Lakdawala i/b. Lakdawala & Co. for the Applicant.
CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATED : 9th March, 2011
P.C. :
[R.Y.GANOO, J.]
Parmita Devendra Sakpal
R.Y. Ganoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court