Petitioner's chamber summons was dismissed as infructuous because the original Will was deposited by an advocate, rendering the application unnecessary. No order as to costs.
Chamber Summons No. 16 of 2011 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CST 16.11.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE CIVIL JURISIDCTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 16 OF 2011 IN PETITION NO. 672 OF 2010
Ramchandra Yashwant Walawalkar.
... Deceased.
Tushar Digambar Parulekar.
... Petitioner.
Mr. B.G. Saraf for the Petitioner.
CORAM : R.Y. GANOO, J.
DATED : 10th MARCH 2011.
P.C. :-
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that original Will is deposited by Advocate Ms. Sonal Doshi. In view of this, the Chamber Summons is dismissed as it has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
(R.Y. GANOO, J.)
Ramchandra Yashwant Walawalkar
Tushar Digambar Parulekar
R.Y. GANOO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
