Respondents withdrew a notice in a contempt petition. The court allowed the withdrawal, resulting in the disposal of the petition as it no longer survived.
Withdrawal of the notice was allowed, leading to the disposal of the Contempt Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 84 OF 2011
Jethibai Delichand Shah Vs. The Municipal Corpn., of Greater Bombay & Anr.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
Mr. Prasad Pathare, Advocate i/b. Mr. R.D. Bindra, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. R.A. Malandkar, Advocate for Respondents 1 and 2.
CORAM : SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.
DATED : 18TH AUGUST, 2011
P.C. :
(SMT. ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
Jethibai Delichand Shah
The Municipal Corpn., of Greater Bombay
Anr.
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
