The High Court, by consent, allowed a Chamber Summons in a suit filed by a practising Advocate. The sum was amended within two weeks, and the matter was stayed to explore settlement.
Chamber Summons allowed and Plaint amendment permitted within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 chs-579-s-219-10
I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
jmi
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.579 OF 2010
IN
SUIT NO. 219 OF 2010.
Ramnek M. Parekh. ..Plaintiff. vs.
Mr. Hilaire D’ Souza & Ors.
..Defendants.
Mr. Ketan R. Parekh, a/w. Mr. Suraj Wasukar, i/b. R.K. Desai, for Plaintiff.
Mr. Ramgopal S. Tripathi, for Defendant Nos. 1to 5.
CORAM : S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. DATE : 20TH JANUARY 2011.
P.C.
By consent of the parties, the following order is passed :
(i) The Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. A copy of the amended Plaint be forthwith forwarded by the Advocate for the Plaintiff to the Advocate for the Defendants.
(ii) The rights and contentions of the Defendants qua the contents of the schedule annexed to the Chamber Summons are kept open in the present Suit as also in the Suit pending between the Son of the Plaintiff and the Defendants at Canada.
[ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ]
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
