The chamber summons is disposed of as the underlying arbitration petition was allowed to be withdrawn by a separate order passed on the same day.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
chs1244-11
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1244 OF 2011 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO.569 OF 2011
Chembur Suprabhat Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. ....Petitioner V/s. Satish Ganpat Mohite & Ors. ...Respondents And Dennis Fernandes ....Applicant
Mr.Abhishek Deshmukh i/b Mr.H.V. Kode for the Petitioner.
Mr.Nitin Nikam i/b M/s.Nitin Nikam & Associates for Respondent No.1.
Mr.Sanjiv A. Sawant for the Applicant.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 23RD AUGUST, 2011.
P.C. :-
a separate order passed today. In the circumstances, it is not necessary to consider the chamber summons. The same is accordingly
disposed of.
Chembur Suprabhat Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd.
Satish Ganpat Mohite
Dennis Fernandes
S.J. Vazifdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
