The High Court allowed an application to restore a writ petition that had been dismissed for want of prosecution, based on reasons stated in the application.
Application allowed; petition restored to file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAW521_11
MP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 521 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10015 OF 2010
Shri Sripad Vinayak Athavale .. Applicant Versus ICICI Bank Limited and others .. Respondents
Mr. S. G. Deshmukh i/b. Mr. Rakesh Patil for Applicant.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J. MARCH 04, 2011
P. C. :
This is an application for the restoration of petition which came to be dismissed for want of prosecution. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Petition is restored to file.
(B.R. GAVAI, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration of a dismissed writ petition should be allowed on the grounds stated.
Shri Sripad Vinayak Athavale
ICICI Bank Limited and others
B.R. Gavai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
