The High Court of Bombay rejected a civil application as it could not be entertained due to a prior intervening order passed on 26/04/2011 in a related civil application. The application lacks substantive content for indexing beyond procedural dismissal.
None other than dismissal of the application as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw-1599-11
: 1 :
PDP
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPLICATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1599 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7703 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or Judge's Orders order or Directions and Registrar's Orders
Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for applicant. Mr. S.K. Talsania, Sr. Counsel with Ms.Kavita Anchan i/by M.V. Kini and Co. for respondent no.1.
Mr. C.R. Sonawane, AGP for State.
CORAM : B. H. MARLAPALLE & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE,JJ.
DATED: September 28, 2011
P.C.
In view of the order passed in Civil Application No. 647 of 2011 on 26/4/2011,
this application cannot be entertained.
The application is, therefore, rejected.
(SMT.NISHITA MHATRE,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)
Applicant
Respondent No. 1
State
B. H. Marlapalle
Nishita Mhatre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
