The High Court of Bombay, in Civil Application No.1024 of 2010, rejected the request for expedition and dismissed the application without costs.
Application for expedition dismissed. Civil Application dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caw-1024-10.sxw
1
dgm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1024 OF 2010 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4931 OF 2006
Shri Uttam Gyanba Chavan .... Petitioner vs Maharashtra State Electric Distribution Compahy Limited and ors. .... Respondents
Mr. R. P. Lote for the applicant.
Mr. Amit Gharte i/by Mr. L.M. Acharya for respondents 1 and 2.
CORAM: DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATE : June 29, 2011
P.C.:
No case for expedition has been made out. Writ Petition to come up in the usual course.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (DR.D. Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant expedited hearing to the writ petition?
If not, what is the appropriate disposal?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Uttam Gyanba Chavan
Maharashtra State Electric Distribution Compahy Limited
D.Y. Chandrachud
Anoop V. Mota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
