M/S. Masitia Steels Ltd. v. Ramchandra Vishwanath Rai and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
abs FARAD CONTINUATION IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CA 656/04
abs
FARAD CONTINUATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 656 OF 2004
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 36768 OF 2003
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders
Mr. C.R. Naidu i/b C.R. Naidu & Co. for the applicant.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 17TH JANUARY 2011
P.C. :
- By his report dated 14th January 2011, the Registrar (Judicial-I) has reported that there is no proper service on respondent nos.1 to 6. The applicant is therefore directed to take steps for service on respondent nos.1 to 6 within one week. If such steps are taken, issue fresh notice
Parties & counsel
- other
Mr. C.R. Naidu
Coram
D.G. KARNIK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court