The court allowed an application for restoration of a civil application and interim relief based on averments made by counsel. Notice of restoration was issued to the second respondent.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Interim relief restored. Notice of restoration issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4047 OF 2002
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1130 OF 2002
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri P.G. Karande for the Applicant. Shri A.R. Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, J. DATE : 17th JANUARY, 2011
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Applicant. None appears for the Respondent No.4. The learned AGP appears for Respondent No.1. In view of the averments made in the application, a case of restoration is made out. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Interim relief which was operating during the pendency of the appeal also stands restored. Notice of restoration be issued to the 2nd Respondent.
(A.S.OKA, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration of suit and interim relief is maintainable.
Applicant
Respondent No.1
Respondent No.4
A.S.OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court