This matter is a single line order rejecting a civil application because the reply filed annexed an exhibit showing no relief could be granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caf280
1
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.280 OF 2011 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.366 OF 2011
.............................................................
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances,Court's Court's or
orders or directions Judge's orders
& Registrar's orders.
.............................................................
Mr.Kunal Cheema i/b Reena Salunkhe for the Applicant
Mr.R.A.Thorat for the respondent nos.1 and 2
CORAM: A.S.OKA,J.
DATE : MARCH 16,2011
P.C.:
1Heard learned counsel for the
parties. Reply of the 1st and 2nd
respondents is taken on record. In
view of Exh.1 annexed to the reply,
no relief as prayed for in this
applicationcanbegranted.
Application is accordingly rejected.
JUDGE
Applicant
Respondent nos.1 and 2
A.S.OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court