Dismissed

Mrs. Sharifa Bi Hanif Shaikh v. 1. the Metropolitan and Regional Development Authority and Another.

Bombay HC28 Jan 2011CAC/35/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application seeking extension of time for surrendering encroached premises, the Bombay HC rejected the plea as no case for indulgence existed given the commercial nature of the land and prohibition on continuing business there.

What did the court decide?

Application for extension of time to surrender encroached premises is rejected.

Mrs. Sharifa Bi Hanif Shaikh Vs 1. the Metropolitan… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2011)

¶1

1 CA 35-2011.sxw

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2011
IN
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 606 OF 2008

¶4

Mrs.Sharifa Bi Hanif Shaikh..Applicant
vs.

¶5

The Mumbai Metropolitan and
Regional Development Authority & Anr...Respondents

¶6

Mr.V.R. Tripathi i/b. M/s.V.R. Tripathi &
Associates for the Applicant.
Mrs.Kiran Bhagaliya for the Respondents.

¶7

CORAM : B.R. GAVAI, J

¶8

DATED : JANUARY 28, 2011.

¶9

P.C. :

¶10

1.This is an application for extension of

¶11

time as was directed by this Court vide Order
dated 21st July, 2010 for surrendering the
premises.

¶12

2This Court vide Order dated 21st July, 2010

¶13

had granted indulgence in favour of the applicant

¶14

2 CA 35-2011.sxw

¶15

and extended period upto 31st January, 2011 for

¶16

surrendering the premises.

¶17

3It is not as if the premises, in question,

¶18

are residential premises. The applicant cannot be

¶19

permitted to carry on the business on the

¶20

encroached premises.

¶21

4In that view of the matter, no case is

¶22

made out for indulgence. Application is rejected.

Mrs. Sharifa Bi Hanif Shaikh v. 1. the Metropolitan and Regional Development Authority and Another.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Sharifa Bi Hanif Shaikh v. 1. the Metropolitan and Regional Development Authority and Another.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Vasant Pandurang Dalvi and Othrs

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Surekha Sharad Gardi (Garde) and Anr.

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Vithabai Ananda Kambale

Smt. Baby Bhagwan Pharate and Others Vs Smt. Sushilabai Shivajirao Chavan Deceased Shalini Shivajirao Chavan and Others

Smt. Baby Bhagwan Pharate and Others Vs Smt. Sushilabai Shivajirao Chavan Deceased Shalini Shivajirao Chavan and Others

Panjab and Maharashtra Co-Op. Bank Ltd. Vs Ravindra Vithal Prabhu and Other