Disposed

Gmidc through Its Executive Engineer Laturl Minor Irrigation Division Latur and Anr. v. Nagnath Gurappa Bargale and Anr.

Bombay HC18 Oct 2011CA/5824/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangad disposed of multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 351-day delay in filing appeals as they were filed by a semi-government corporation where file transfers caused the delay.

What did the court decide?

Civil applications allowed; delay of 351 days condoned; applications disposed of.

Gmidc through Its Executive Engineer Laturl… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2011)

¶1

C.A.No.5824 of 2011

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5824 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.5995 OF 2011

¶5

Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation through its Executive Engineer, Latur Minor Irrigation Division, Latur and anr.

¶6

..Applicants

¶7

Versus

¶8

Nagnath s/o Gurappa Bargale and anr.

¶9

..Respondents

¶10

WITH -

¶11

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5826 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.6031 OF 2011

¶12

Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation through its Executive Engineer, Latur Minor Irrigation Division, Latur and anr.

¶13

..Applicants

¶14

Versus

¶15

Chandrakant Sitaram Nalawade and anr. ..Respondents

¶16

WITH -

¶17

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5829 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.6014 OF 2011

¶18

Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation through its Executive Engineer, Latur Minor Irrigation Division, Latur and anr.

..Applicants

C.A.No.5824 of 2011

Versus

Maruti Arjun Kawale (died) through L.Rs.

¶24

Girijabai Maruti Kawale and ors.

¶25

..Respondents

¶26

WITH -

¶27

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5833 OF 2011 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.6037 OF 2011

¶28

Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation through its Executive Engineer, Latur Minor Irrigation Division, Latur and anr.

¶29

..Applicants

¶30

Versus

¶31

Mahadu s/o Irappa Pitale and anr.

¶32

. ..Respondents

¶33

Mr S.G.Sangle, Advocate for applicants Mrs V.A.Shinde, A.G.P. for respondents 2 and 3 Mr M.S.Patil, Advocate for respondent No.4

¶34

CORAM : MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

¶35

DATE : 18^th October 2011

¶36

PER COURT

¶37

Applications for condonation of delay of 351 days are filed.

¶38

Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is

¶39

a Corporation, a semi government organisation and, therefore, delay

¶40

is caused as the file was moved from one department to another. The

¶41

delay is not intentional.

¶42

C.A.No.5824 of 2011

¶43

¶44

For the reasons mentioned therein, applications are allowed. Delay condoned. Civil Applications are disposed of.

¶45

( MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. )

¶46

(vvr/5824.11ca)

Gmidc through Its Executive Engineer Laturl Minor Irrigation Division Latur and Anr. v. Nagnath Gurappa Bargale and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gmidc through Its Executive Engineer Laturl Minor Irrigation Division Latur and Anr. v. Nagnath Gurappa Bargale and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ratna W/O Rajpal Gandle Vs Smt.Kanta W/O Sadashiv Dahat and14 Ors.

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs Neeta Renukadas Deshpande and Ors.

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs Neeta Renukadas Deshpande and Ors.

Sudam Vitthal Dongare (C F Paid in Lower Court) Vs Subhash Vithoba Chaudhari

Gmidc through Its Executive Engineer Laturl Minor Irrigation Division Latur and Anr. Vs Nagnath Gurappa Bargale and Anr.

Gmidc through Its Executive Engineer Laturl Minor Irrigation Division Latur and Anr. Vs Nagnath Gurappa Bargale and Anr.