N Anjanaiah v. Shrikant Vishwanath Puranik and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What did the court decide?
Civil application disposed of as similar applications already decided.
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
Civil application disposed of as similar applications already decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
WRIT PETITION NO.: 1218 OF 2005
***
1. Similar applications for vacation of
interim orders are already decided by this
Court and Advocate Mr. R.R.Mantri is already
discharged. Hence, present civil application
is also disposed of. Office to delete name
of Advocate Mr. Mantri from docket.
[B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.]
Dated:11/03/2011.
ans/1218
B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court