Application for bail was rejected due to the presence of a strong prima facie case in a serious assault matter. The court directed the trial court to expedite the trial, aiming for completion within three months.
Application rejected; trial directed to be completed within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BA-570-11.sxw
1
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.570 OF 2011
| Rajendra Amrutrao Satav V/s. |
... | Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| State of Maharashtra, | ||
| Thru' Lonikand Police Station | ... | Respondent |
Mr. A.P. Mundargi, Sr. Counsel, i/b. Mr. D.D. Shinde, for the Applicant.
Mr. K.V. Saste, APP, for the Respondent.
Mr. M.K. Kocharekar for the First Informant.
CORAM:- A.M. THIPSAY, J. DATED :- 28TH JUNE, 2011.
P.C. :
BA-570-11.sxw
2
Dixit
[ A.M. THIPSAY, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant in a case involving serious assault causing bodily injury.
Rajendra Amrutrao Satav
State of Maharashtra
A.M. Thipsay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
