Disposed
L and T Finance Ltd. v. Rajendra Bhai M. Vala and Anr.
Bombay HCARBP/750/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
arbp596-11c
1
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.596 OF 2011
L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner
V/s.
Firoz M. Shaikh & Anr. ...Respondents
WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (LODGING) NO.620 OF 2011
L & T Finance Limited ....Petitioner V/s. Rajendra Bhai M. Vala & Anr. ...Respondents
Ms.Disha Karambar for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 22ND AUGUST, 2011.
P.C. :-
1. These are petitions under section 9 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitions are admitted.
agreements entered into between the parties in each case. The repayment is secured by the hypothecation of the vehicles/equipments. The respondents are absent, though served.
2 arbp596-11c
passed on 6.7.2011. The respondents were absent at that stage. They are absent today also, though served.
i). The petitions are made absolute in terms of prayers (a), except the portions bracketed in red, (c) and (d). Prayer (c) shall be complied with forthwith upon the respondents being served a copy of this order.
No order as to costs.
This order shall remain in force till the award is made and for a period of twelve weeks thereafter.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
L & T Finance Limited
Firoz M. Shaikh
Rajendra Bhai M. Vala
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court