The arbitrator disposed of an arbitration petition wherein the respondent No.2 was directed to simultaneously inform the petitioner upon making payment to respondent No.1.
Respondent No.2 to inform Petitioner and advocate simultaneously upon making payment to Respondent No.1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
arbp239-11
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.239 OF 2011
Hind Offshore Pvt. Ltd. ....Petitioner V/s. Naftogaz India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ....Respondents
Mr.Sudip Sen with Mr.Shivkumar G. i/b Bose & Mitra for the Petitioner.
Mr.Siddharth Thakkar i/b Mr.A.B. Vagyani for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 29TH JULY, 2011.
P.C. :-
dated 5.7.2011.
Hind Offshore Pvt. Ltd.
Naftogaz India Pvt. Ltd.
Anr.
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
