This single judge order allows a restoration application for a dismissed criminal revision. The judge finds the applicant's reasons satisfactory and directs the matter to be placed for final hearing from 28/11/2011.
Revision Application No.279 of 2001 is restored; matter placed for final hearing from 28/11/2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
appr-400
srp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIM. APPL. NO. 400 OF 2011 IN CRIM. REVISION APPL. NO. 279 OF 2001.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
Mr. Ramesh Dube Patil i/b M/s. Jay & Co., for the applicant. Mr. M.R. Deshpande for R-2. Mr. A. S. Shitole, APP for the State.
Coram : RANJIT MORE, J. Date : October 17, 2011.
P. C. :
of Revision Application No.279 of 2001, which came to be dismissed on 2/7/2010 as none appeared for the petitioner when the matter was called out for hearing. The applicant has given reasons in para nos. 5, 6 & 8, which I find to be satisfactory. Hence, revision is restored the file. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision application under CrPC 1973 can be restored after dismissal for non-appearance.
Whether the reasons provided for the non-appearance are satisfactory for restoration.
Applicant
R-2
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
