The criminal application was disposed of as not pressed since it had been taken up administratively by the District Judge. Liberty was granted to approach the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.962 OF 2011
(Shri Arvind Namdeorao Rodewadkar Vs. The State of Maharashtra)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri P.V. Mandlik, Senior Counsel, instructed by Shri A.S. Gandhi, Advocate for applicant Shri P.P. More, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. DATED : 29th June, 2011.
applicant. As the matter has been taken up in the administrative side by the learned Principal District Judge at Nanded, for the present, learned Senior Counsel, on instructions, does not press the application. Disposed of as not pressed. Liberty.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL, J. )
fmp/cri962.11
Arvind Namdeorao Rodewadkar
The State of Maharashtra
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
