The High Court Court restored the criminal appeal and condoned a one-day delay following the filing of a restoration and condonation application.
The appeal is restored and the delay of one day is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3866 OF 2011 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3748 OF 2011 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.96 OF 2010
(Balu s/o Devanathrao Khandagale Vs. Pratap s/o Devchand Golwal)
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders
Shri A.R. Kawade, Advocate for applicant Shri S.B. Madde, Advocate holding for Shri N.B. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent
CORAM : U.D. SALVI, J.
DATED : 29th September, 2011.
fmp/cri3866.11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be restored and delay condoned in the interest of justice.
Balu s/o Devanathrao Khandagale
Pratap s/o Devchand Golwal
U.D. Salvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
