The High Court dismissed two criminal applications in default for failing to file an affidavit of service of notice despite previous direction. The court observed the applicant lacked interest in prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 APPLN-3395-07.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Mhi
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3395 OF 2007 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007 WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 201 OF 2011
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2011
Suman Builders & Developers
.. Applicant (Orig. complainant)
vs.
Mr. Virendra Pethe i/b. Balkrishna D.Joshi, Advocate, for the applicant. Mrs. G.P.Mulekar, APP for the respondent - State.
CORAM: J.H.BHATIA,J.
DATE : 20th October, 2011.
P.C.
By order dated 29.4.2011, this Court had directed the applicant to
serve the respondent No.1 by fixation of notice on the last known address as well as by publication. Since then repeatedly the matter has been adjourned for filing affidavit of service by publication or otherwise, but no affidavit is filed. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matters.
2 APPLN-3395-07.sxw
Both the Applications stand dismissed in default.
(J.H.BHATIA,J.)
Suman Builders & Developers
Prabhakar Jayram Ahire
J.H. BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
