Shesherao Kisanrao Potfode v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
On the confirmation of interim anticipatory bail in a cheating and forgery case, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay denied the need for custodial interrogation and directed applicants to cooperate with the investigation and provide signatures for expert analysis.
What did the court decide?
Interim anticipatory bail confirmed; applicants directed to cooperate, attend investigator, and provide signatures for handwriting expert opinion.
What the court decided
crap3304.11
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3304 OF 2011
Shesherao s/o Kisanrao Potfode ...Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, through P.S.I. Wadwani Police Station ...Respondent
A N D
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3522 OF 2011
Balasaheb Bhagwanrao Rodge ...Applicant
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Shri B.S.Kudale, advocate for applicants Shri B.V.Wagh, A.P.P. for respondent
CORAM : SHRIHARI P.DAVARE, J.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether interim anticipatory bail granted to applicants seeking protection against complaints of theft and forgery under IPC Sections 420, 467, and 471 deserves confirmation.
Whether custodial interrogation of the applicants is necessary for the further progress of the investigation given their willingness to cooperate.
Whether applicants should be directed to attend before the investigator and provide signatures for handwriting expert opinion.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shesherao s/o Kisanrao Potfode
- appellant
Balasaheb Bhagwanrao Rodge
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court