Court allowed the applicant to withdraw the criminal application and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Application allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3201 OF 2011
Vishwanath s/o Vasudev Yadnik
Applicant
Versus
1 The State of Maharashtra
2 The Superintendent of Police, Jalgaon.
Respondents
Mr.V.J.Dixit, Senior Counsel holding for Mr.A.A.Mukhedkar, advocate for the applicant. Mr.D.R.Kale, advocate for Respondents.
CORAM : R.Y.GANOO, J. DATE : 28th November, 2011
PER COURT:
After some arguments, learned Senior Counsel Mr.Dixit, appearing on behalf of the applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the applications.
Application is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of accordingly.
R.Y.GANOO
JUDGE
adb/cria320111
Vishwanath s/o Vasudev Yadnik
The State of Maharashtra
The Superintendent of Police, Jalgaon
R.Y.GANOO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
