Criminal Application allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of after applicant Godhamgaonkar consented to discharge and counsel sought withdrawal.
Leave to withdraw the criminal application allowed; applicant discharged; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1. FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2511/2008.
(Bhaskarrao s/o Dinkarrao Meshram Vs. The State of Mah. and Ors.)
Office notes, office Memoranda of
Coram,appearances, Court’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
or directions and Registrar’s orders
Mr.NS Ghanekar, Adv. for applicant;
Mr. VH Dighe, APP for State.
CORAM: K.U.CHANDIWAL,J.
DATE :14th January, 2011.
1) Mr.Godhamgaonkar informs, since he has
recorded his consent, he needs to be
discharged.
2) Officetoaccordinglydischarge
Mr.Godahmgaonkar.
3) On instructions, Mr.Ghanekar seeks leave to withdraw the criminal application. Allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.(K.U.CHANDIWAL)
JUDGE
bdv/
Bhaskarrao s/o Dinkarrao Meshram
The State of Mah. and Ors.
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court