The High Court at Aurangabad allowed an application by Ashok s/o Trimbak Patil to intervene in Criminal Writ Petition No.412 of 2011, noting that the applicant had previously been permitted to intervene in an earlier petition regarding the same order.
Application to intervene in Writ Petition No.412 of 2011 allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2352 OF 2011 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.412 OF 2011
Ashok s/o Trimbak Patil
..Applicant
Versus
Rushikesh s/o Tanaji Bhoite and ors.
..Respondents
Mr Hemant Surve, Advocate for applicant Mr S.D.Kaldate, A.P.P. for respondent Nos.2 to 4 Mr R.D.Sanap, Advocate holding for Mr U.N.Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.1
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ.
DATE : 29th June 2011
PER COURT
By this application the applicant seeks to intervene in Writ Petition No.412 of 2011 as an intervenor. It appears that in the earlier petition filed by the same petitioner questioning the same impugned order, the applicant had been allowed to intervene in the petition. Consequently, we allow this application and permit the applicant to intervene in this petition.
( A.V. POTDAR, J. ) ( P.V. HARDAS, J. )
(vvr/2352.11criappln)
Ashok s/o Trimbak Patil
Rushikesh s/o Tanaji Bhoite
P.V. Hardas
A.V. Potdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
