Allowed quashing of criminal proceedings after parties settled the civil dispute. Court held no public interest in pending trial but imposed Rs.5,000 costs on applicants.
Quash of case No.368/SS/2005; Rs.5,000 costs to be paid by applicants to Police Welfare Fund.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mst
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2343 OF 2007
S.K.Malik and another Applicants versus Rajan Gulrajani and others Respondents
Mr.P.D.Desai with Rupesh Mandhare for applicants. Ms.M.R.Bhagwat i/by J.J.Thakkar for respondent nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J.
DATE : 16th December 2011
PC :
2
No.368/SS/2005 are quashed and set aside.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings should be quashed after the underlying civil dispute has been settled amicably.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of PunjabRelied on¶6
Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab (2008)4-SCC-582 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
S.K. Malik
Anupam Malik
Rajan Gulrajani
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
