The applicant's counsel submitted that since the financial term was not met, the earlier relief was vacated and the applicant no longer presses the present application. The High Court dismissed the application as not pressed by the applicant. No legal principle was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2254 OF 2011
,In APPLN/1577/2011
HAJI ABDUL RASHEED HAJI MOHAMMED HUSSAIN KANDHARI VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Ansari A.n. APP for Respondent(s): Mr.Ingole G.R.
CORAM : SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. Dated: August 26, 2011
( SHRIHARI P. DAVARE, J. )
aaa/-
HAJI ABDUL RASHEED HAJI MOHAMMED HUSSAIN KANDHARI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SHRIHARI P. DAVARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
