The applicant requested leave to withdraw the criminal application and to challenge the chargesheet subsequently. The court granted leave to withdraw the application on this condition and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the application granted with liberty to challenge the chargesheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
Criapln1910-10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1910 OF 2010
Unmesh Shantanurao PatilAPPLICANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & another RESPONDENTS
.....
Mr. Ujjwal S. Patil, advocate holding for Mr. R.S.
Deshmukh, advocate for the applicant.
Mr. N.B. Patil, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State.
Mr. G.G. Suryawanshi, advocate for the respondent No.2.
.....
ORAL ORDER:
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that
since the chargesheet is filed, the applicant wants
to withdraw the present application with liberty to
challenge the chargesheet filed in the matter. Leave
to withdraw the application is granted, with liberty
as prayed for. The application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
NPJ/criapln1910-10
Unmesh Shantanurao Patil
The State of Maharashtra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court